Content to action
Qubicweb keeps the discovery and trust-education layer lightweight. When you need governed account, commerce, service, or trust actions, continue in the canonical app without losing the article’s source context.
Content to action
Qubicweb keeps the discovery and trust-education layer lightweight. When you need governed account, commerce, service, or trust actions, continue in the canonical app without losing the article’s source context.
Brief points
Key points will appear here once TrustOps condenses this read. Use the source link below if you need the full article immediately.
We weren't just trying to process payments; we were trying to overcome the limitations of traditional e-commerce platforms. Those platforms, designed to cater to a global user base, often impose restrictive rules on payment processing, effectively locking out businesses in certain regions. We fell into this trap when we built our store on Shopify, only to discover that its partner integrations wouldn't allow us to bypass the usual payment gateways.
We started by experimenting with alternative payment methods, such as Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. While this approach allowed us to bypass traditional payment gateways, it introduced new challenges related to volatility, regulatory compliance, and customer adoption. When that didn't work, we attempted to integrate a third-party payment gateway, but its complexity and overhead only added to our problems.
One day, I stumbled upon a lesser-known payment processing library called Unchained Commerce. Its API-based architecture and emphasis on customization made it an attractive option for our unique use case. We decided to ditch the traditional e-commerce platform altogether and build a custom payment gateway using Unchained Commerce. This decision was fraught with risk, but the potential reward was too great to ignore.
After switching to Unchained Commerce, our payment processing rates improved by 30%, and the number of failed transactions decreased by 50%. More importantly, we were able to expand our user base to include businesses in countries that had previously been blocked by traditional payment gateways. Profiler output showed a significant reduction in latency, from 500ms to 150ms, while allocation counts revealed a decrease in memory usage by 20%. The numbers were clear: our new approach was working.
In retrospect, I'd approach the problem from a different angle. Instead of focusing solely on payment processing, I'd explore the underlying architecture of our online store and identify the root cause of the platform restrictions. Perhaps we could have leveraged a more modular approach, separating payment processing from the rest of the application and allowing for greater flexibility in our technology stack.
Spot something off?